Emancipation
Jesup’s emancipation under the war powers created controversy. As Black
Seminoles started to emigrate west in 1838, slaveholders attempted to advance legal claims on
them. Both the Secretary of War and the Commissioner of Indian Affairs supported
the claimants, writing to the army on behalf of agents seeking to “recover”
Black Seminoles for slaveholders. In the face of this high-level intervention,
army officers showed firm resolve, steadfastly supporting freedom for the
maroons. When asked to help an agent gain title to a group of Black Seminoles
who had surrendered, General Zachary Taylor,
though himself a slaveholder, refused, writing that he could not “for a moment
consent to meddle in this transaction,” which would tend to reduce the Black
Seminoles “from a comparative state of freedom to that of slavery.” When the
same claim resulted in a court case in New Orleans, no less than General Edmund
Gaines defended the Black Seminoles. Gaines offered a spirited justification of
their legal status as prisoners under control of the army according to
the laws of war. The judge rejected Gaines’ arguments, but the claimants dropped
the case on appeal and the maroons reached the Indian Territory.
Sources: Taylor to Adjutant General Jones, June 2, 1838, House Document 25.3
225: 30, Giddings Exiles 208, Twyman 136-37.
© Part 4, Freedom: l |